Kanye West’s name was mentioned during the first day of jury selection in Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ trial, as the rap mogul faces charges of sex trafficking and racketeering
The music mogul Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs, aged 55, made his way into a Manhattan federal courtroom on Monday, as the process of jury selection kicked off for a legal showdown that could see him facing a lengthy prison sentence.
But it was an unexpected name drop of Kanye West that raised eyebrows when a scientist in his forties, being considered for the jury, admitted he recognised West’s name from a list associated with the trial, according to MailOnline.
The potential juror assured the court that despite knowing of West, he could remain impartial and unbiased in his judgement.
West, who is not a defendant in this case, has been publicly backing Combs, stirring up controversy with online posts and earlier this year, announcing a fashion collaboration with the Bad Boy Records boss.
READ MORE: Where the stars of Airline are now from prison sentences to secret health battlesREAD MORE: ‘Living Nostradamus’ makes chilling Prince Harry prediction about irreversible damage
As the legal proceedings heat up, a plethora of celebrity names have been mentioned; jurors were presented with a comprehensive list of famous figures who might be referenced during the trial—a list so long that Judge Arun Subramanian humorously compared it to an “appendix from Lord of the Rings.”
To streamline the process, jurors will receive this list in advance, simplifying their individual questioning sessions, as reported by the Express, reports the Mirror US.
Included in this star-studded list are actor Michael B. Jordan, comedian Mike Myers, Destiny’s Child singer Michelle Williams, actress Lauren London—known for her connection with the late Nipsey Hussle—and rapper Kid Cudi, although the specifics of their involvement in the case remain unclear.
What exactly is Diddy being tried for?
The trial gravitating around Sean Combs has taken an expansive scope, sweeping up incidents dating back to 2004 and extending over multiple states. A pool of potential jurors has been introduced to the substantial charges which include sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy.
Judge Subramanian has reiterated to them that despite the allegations, Combs maintains a not guilty plea, insisting he is to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Since his September apprehension, Combs has resided in a stark Brooklyn federal facility. His courtroom appearance was marked by a sweater layered over a crisp white shirt and grey slacks – a judicially approved alternative to standard prison wear.
Now at 55, the absence of hair dye in prison has left Combs’ hair and goatee visibly grey.
How to watch the Diddy saga unfold
Unlike the typical media circus surrounding celeb trials, this one’s strictly traditional – no broadcasts for audiences due to federal courtrooms enforcing a rigid no-electronics rule, leaving sketch artists as your only visual informants.
Brace yourselves; this trial isn’t going to be swift. An estimated span of eight weeks could be on the cards, with Combs potentially staring down a lengthy sentence behind bars if found guilty.
Even during jury selection nuances surface, with certain members admitting awareness of a particular piece of evidence – a 2016 video surfacing online displaying Combs in a rather violent exchange, attacking singer Cassie in a Los Angeles hotel corridor. One juror described the clip as “damning evidence” leading to her dismissal from the selection process.
After the excusal of another juror, a clearly anxious Combs requested to use the facilities, sheepishly telling the judge, “I’m sorry your honor, I’m a little nervous today.”
Has Diddy come clean about any misconduct?
The trial involving Combs has become the center of massive public and media focus, with the extensive 17-page indictment outlining an alarming tale of abuse spanning over two decades. The prosecution claims that Combs operated with the authority akin to a Mafia boss or drug lord, using his group of associates and staff to maintain power, coerce, and terrorize victims.
The indictment goes on to allege that Combs lured women into participating in drug-fuelled sexual interactions with male sex workers at events that he is purported to have called “Freak Offs.”
According to prosecutors, Combs abused his prominent status within the industry to reward those who succumbed to his demands and to punish those who defied his wishes—employing threats, violence, even kidnapping and arson. They assert scenarios such as Combs threatening individuals by dangling them off a balcony.
In a fervent rebuttal, Combs and his legal team have outright dismissed all charges, insisting that any intimate relations were entirely consensual and did not revolve around any illicit enterprise.
