The ability of MPs to discuss matters relating to the Royal family is constrained under the Commons’ procedures but MPs have the power to raise an issue
MPs could potentially debate Prince Andrew’s behaviour, his 30-room mansion and the possibility of him being stripped of his dukedom.
The Government has so far declined to set aside time in the House of Commons for MPs to discuss Andrew’s situation, as the Royal family wishes Parliament to concentrate on “important issues”.
However, the topic could be brought up on one of the days when ministers do not control the parliamentary schedule. A source from the Liberal Democrat party hinted to the Sunday Times that they might be willing to use one of their opposition days to allow MPs to discuss Andrew’s conduct.
READ MORE: Four women devoure £300 worth of steaks and cocktails then leave without paying
READ MORE: Police share new CCTV from inside library as hunt for missing sex offender continues
The prince is reportedly considering voluntarily leaving his Royal Lodge home following the uproar over the “peppercorn” rent for the Windsor property.
The King’s brother is believed to be in discussions with Charles’ representatives but is hesitant to relinquish his residence of over 20 years, with the main sticking points reportedly being the location of his new home and financial compensation for funds spent on the lodge.
Andrew tried to put an end to years of controversy, following allegations he sexually abused Virginia Giuffre, by renouncing his dukedom and other honours ahead of the publication of Giuffre’s posthumous memoirs.
However, the prince, who vehemently denies the allegations, was instead overwhelmed by criticism that has centred on the property he has lived in effectively rent-free since 2003.
The guide to the rules, known as Erskine May, states that “unless the discussion is based upon a substantive motion, drawn in proper terms, reflections must not be cast in debate upon the conduct of the sovereign, the heir to the throne, or other members of the royal family”.
With the Government reluctant to table a motion to discuss Andrew due to the wishes of the Royal family, an opposition day debate could provide a route for MPs to voice their concerns.
A Liberal Democrat source said: “We need to explore all options, including an opposition day debate, to ensure Parliament can scrutinise this properly, from Prince Andrew’s residence at Royal Lodge to his dukedom.
“The first thing we need is proper transparency and accountability – that’s why we have called for the Crown Estate and Prince Andrew to give evidence under oath in Parliament.”
The Lib Dems have one opposition day remaining this parliamentary session, but no date has yet been allocated for it. The source told the PA news agency: “We’ll take a decision on what is most important for the national interest as and when the government tells us when it will be.”
The Lib Dem insider suggested that they hoped the King would be willing to take action.
“It’s right that we’re led by the King on this, and if Parliament does have to act we hope it can be be hand-in-hand with the Palace,” the source said. Despite Andrew relinquishing the use of his Duke of York title, only an act of Parliament can officially strip him of it.
