Jake Paul beat Mike Tyson earlier this month but the fight was blighted by claims it was fixed to ensure 58-year-old Tyson could not win
Jake Paul’s promotional company has released a statement insisting his fight with Mike Tyson was not fixed.
Paul outpointed 58-year-old Tyson in Dallas earlier this month after eight rounds during which the boxing legend barely threw a punch. YouTuber Paul later admitted to ‘carrying’ Tyson, revealing he didn’t want to hurt the former heavyweight world champion.
Since the final bell, theories have flooded the internet about the contract for the bout with NFL legend Michael Irwin claiming the contract prohibited Tyson from throwing certain shots. “I was looking for that patent ‘one in the body, one on the uppercut,’ ” Irvin said on The Herd podcast. “When he hits that it’s boom boom, boom. I want to see that, but we didn’t get that, not a one. And I saw someone else say that it was in the contract – ‘no uppercuts’. They had it in the contract. Come on guys, why wouldn’t Mike Tyson throw an uppercut?”
But a statement from Most Valuable Promotions read: “Following the wide circulation of incorrect and baseless claims that undermine the integrity of the Paul vs. Tyson event, Most Valuable Promotions (MVP) would like to set the record straight regarding the contractual agreements and the nature of the fight.
Rigging a professional boxing match is a federal crime in the United States of America. Paul vs. Tyson was a professional match sanctioned by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulations (TDLR). Both fighters in good faith performed to the best of their abilities with the goal of winning the fight. There were absolutely no restrictions – contractual or otherwise – around either fighter. Each boxer was able to use his full arsenal to win the fight. Any agreement to the contrary would violate TDLR boxing rules.
“Trash talk and speculation are common in sports, and athletes and promoters need to tolerate nonsensical commentary, jokes and opinions. But suggesting anything other than full effort from these fighters is not only naïve but an insult to the work they put into their craft and to the sport itself.
“It is further illogical and inane that MVP, in the debut of a hopeful long-term partnership with the world ’s biggest streamer—an organisation that made its first-ever foray into live professional sports with Paul vs. Tyson—would even so much as consider such a perverse violation of the rules of competition.”
MVP’s co-founder Nakisa Bidarian added: “This is not the first time Jake Paul has faced unfounded skepticism or outright disbelief as a professional athlete, and frankly, the claim that his bout must have been rigged is just the latest backhanded compliment to come his way. From day one in this sport, people have doubted his abilities—unable to reconcile how someone with his background has accomplished so much in such a short time.
“Jake has not only proven himself repeatedly, but he has continuously set historic records that speak for themselves. This event, which broke attendance and viewership milestones for a professional sporting event, is yet another example of his ability to deliver on the biggest stage. As long as Jake continues to exceed expectations, there will always be those who try to discredit his achievements. We embrace the doubt—it only fuels Jake to work harder and achieve greater success.”
